SAKSHI BAHUGUNA vs C RAVI SHANKAR — CLCON/342/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.

Next hearing 12-Aug-2026

CNR: UKHC010103372026

Filing Number

CLCON/5390/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

CLCON/342/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAKSHI BAHUGUNA

    Adv. LALIT SAMANT,MADHU NEGI SAMANT,MADHU NEGI SAMANT, ,MADHU NEGI SAMANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C RAVI SHANKAR

  2. 2.SANJAY KUMAR

Case History

  1. 12-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Aug-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: CLCON 342/2026 Sakshi Bahuguna filed a contempt petition alleging that respondents C Ravi Shankar and Sanjay Kumar willfully violated a 2012 Division Bench order directing payment of remuneration difference to contractual instructors at I.T.I. Pabau. Despite the order attaining Supreme Court finality (review petition rejected on 11.11.2025), the respondents remained non-compliant. The court issued notices to respondent-contemnors returnable within four weeks, allowed them three weeks to file response or comply with the order, and adjourned the case to 12.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/342/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CLCON 342/2026 Sakshi Bahuguna filed a contempt petition alleging that respondents C Ravi Shankar and Sanjay Kumar willfully violated a 2012 Division Bench order directing payment of remuneration difference to contractual instructors at I.T.I. Pabau. Despite the order attaining Supreme Court finality (review petition rejected on 11.11.2025), the respondents remained non-compliant. The court issued notices to respondent-contemnors returnable within four weeks, allowed them three weeks to file response or comply with the order, and adjourned the case to 12.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case