SHUBHAM AGNIHOTRI AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1115/2026

Case under Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (Act No. 28 of 1961) Section 3,4. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010103352026

Filing Number

WPCRL/4945/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1115/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (Act No. 28 of 1961) Section 3,4
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),351(2),352,85

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHUBHAM AGNIHOTRI AND ORS

    Adv. AMREEN BANO,SPARSH GUPTA,SPARSH GUPTA, ,SPARSH GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  4. 4.SMT. KANCHAN SHARMA

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: WPCRL/1115/2026 Shubham Agnihotri and others sought quashing of FIR No. 0174/2026 registered under dowry prohibition and cruelty charges, alleging false implication due to matrimonial discord. The court issued notice to the respondent and granted interim protection, directing that the petitioner shall not be arrested pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1115/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL/1115/2026 Shubham Agnihotri and others sought quashing of FIR No. 0174/2026 registered under dowry prohibition and cruelty charges, alleging false implication due to matrimonial discord. The court issued notice to the respondent and granted interim protection, directing that the petitioner shall not be arrested pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case