ASHOK TIWARI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1114/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010103222026

Filing Number

WPCRL/4939/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1114/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK TIWARI

    Adv. RAJAT MITTAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.SAMEER

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: WPCRL/1114/2026 Ashok Tiwari v. State of Uttarakhand Ashok Tiwari filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR (No. 0355/2026) under Section 318(4) BNS alleging he defrauded a student (Respondent 3) of ₹99,500 by collecting admission facilitation charges and fees for an LL.B. course without providing admission or examination access. The court granted interim protection: the petitioner shall not be arrested pending investigation, provided he cooperates with the Investigating Officer. The case is adjourned for receipt of the service report; the State was given four weeks to file a counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1114/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL/1114/2026 Ashok Tiwari v. State of Uttarakhand Ashok Tiwari filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR (No. 0355/2026) under Section 318(4) BNS alleging he defrauded a student (Respondent 3) of ₹99,500 by collecting admission facilitation charges and fees for an LL.B. course without providing admission or examination access. The court granted interim protection: the petitioner shall not be arrested pending investigation, provided he cooperates with the Investigating Officer. The case is adjourned for receipt of the service report; the State was given four weeks to file a counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case