DR SHREYA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSB/341/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010103182026
Filing Number
WPSB/5381/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPSB/341/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR SHREYA
Adv. AMAR MURTI SHUKLA,GOPAL NARAIN,GOPAL NARAIN, ,GOPAL NARAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DAYANAND ANGLO VEDIC D A C COLLEGE
-
4.HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA GARHWAL UNIVERSITY
Adv. DR. KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA
-
5.BOARD OF MANAGEMENT
-
6.PRINCIPAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of Dr. Shreya's writ petition seeking salary arrears as an Assistant Professor at DAV College, finding it unclear whether the Management Committee or State Government was liable for payment. The court allowed her to file a fresh representation before the Competent Authority, which must decide within eight weeks by a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSB/341/2026
The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of Dr. Shreya's writ petition seeking salary arrears as an Assistant Professor at DAV College, finding it unclear whether the Management Committee or State Government was liable for payment. The court allowed her to file a fresh representation before the Competent Authority, which must decide within eight weeks by a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts