HEMANT RAINA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — ABA/219/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010103172026

Filing Number

ABA/4936/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

ABA/219/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMANT RAINA

    Adv. PRAGYA PRAKASH UPADHYAY,RAKSHIT JOSHI,RAKSHIT JOSHI, ,RAKSHIT JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: ABA/219/2026 Petitioner: Hemant Raina Respondent: State of Uttarakhand Court: High Court of Uttarakhand Judge: Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Outcome: Interim anticipatory bail granted. The court found that Raina's apprehension of arrest for alleged sexual offenses under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 was founded on concrete facts (WhatsApp conversations indicating threats and a written compromise at police station). The court rejected the argument that absence of an FIR defeats jurisdiction and conditionally granted interim anticipatory bail requiring: (i) cooperation with investigation, and (ii) no contact with witnesses. Case listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/219/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/219/2026 Petitioner: Hemant Raina Respondent: State of Uttarakhand Court: High Court of Uttarakhand Judge: Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Outcome: Interim anticipatory bail granted. The court found that Raina's apprehension of arrest for alleged sexual offenses under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 was founded on concrete facts (WhatsApp conversations indicating threats and a written compromise at police station). The court rejected the argument that absence of an FIR defeats jurisdiction and conditionally granted interim anticipatory bail requiring: (i) cooperation with investigation, and (ii) no contact with witnesses. Case listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case