VIKAS vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEPUTY S.G. — WPSS/1560/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010103072026

Filing Number

WPSB/5374/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1560/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS

    Adv. C S RAWAT,RAJNI SUPYAL/LATWAL,RAJNI SUPYAL/LATWAL, ,VAIBHAV GUPTA,VIVEK KUMAR,RAJNI SUPYAL/LATWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEPUTY S.G.

  2. 2.DIRECTOR ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

  3. 3.DIRECTOR ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

  4. 4.DIRECTOR ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The court dismissed Vikas's petition challenging a recruitment order dated 04.04.2026 by AIIMS Rishikesh, finding that the matter falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. The petitioner was directed to approach the CAT instead, as it constitutes an alternative efficacious remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1560/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Vikas's petition challenging a recruitment order dated 04.04.2026 by AIIMS Rishikesh, finding that the matter falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. The petitioner was directed to approach the CAT instead, as it constitutes an alternative efficacious remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case