KAILASH CHAND SATI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1111/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),351(2),352. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010102932026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
WPCRL/4923/2026
Filing Date
10-06-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/1111/2026
Registration Date
10-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
FIR QUASHING ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAILASH CHAND SATI
Adv. SANPREET SINGH AJMANI,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA, ,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA
GAURAV SATI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. G.A.
NIRMAL SINGH
Adv. ABHISHEK VERMA (FOR CAVEATOR)
GURPREET SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPCRL/1111/2026 Kailash Chand Sati and Gaurav Sati sought quashing of FIR Crime No.9 of 2026 under Sections 318(4), 351(2) & 352 BNS 2023, registered at Kaladhungi Police Station. The FIR, lodged by respondent Nirmal Singh (as attorney of an NRI), alleged petitioners sold 22,640 sq. metres of land (exceeding their 11,060 sq. metre purchase) to non-residents, including state and restricted-category land. Petitioners contended the FIR was retaliatory and that allegations concern state land matters requiring competent authority action, not private criminal prosecution. Court Order (12.06.2026): The petition was admitted. Notice issued to respondent no.4. Investigation permitted to continue, but petitioners granted protection from arrest provided they cooperate. Case adjourned for next hearing after service report received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPCRL/1111/2026 Kailash Chand Sati and Gaurav Sati sought quashing of FIR Crime No.9 of 2026 under Sections 318(4), 351(2) & 352 BNS 2023, registered at Kaladhungi Police Station. The FIR, lodged by respondent Nirmal Singh (as attorney of an NRI), alleged petitioners sold 22,640 sq. metres of land (exceeding their 11,060 sq. metre purchase) to non-residents, including state and restricted-category land. Petitioners contended the FIR was retaliatory and that allegations concern state land matters requiring competent authority action, not private criminal prosecution. Court Order (12.06.2026): The petition was admitted. Notice issued to respondent no.4. Investigation permitted to continue, but petitioners granted protection from arrest provided they cooperate. Case adjourned for next hearing after service report received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts