M/S KUNWAR CONSTRUCTION vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1107/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010102802026
Filing Number
WPCRL/4918/2026
Filing Date
10-06-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/1107/2026
Registration Date
10-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S KUNWAR CONSTRUCTION
Adv. JITENDRA CHAUDHARY,NAVNEET SINGH,NAVNEET SINGH, ,DEVENDRA SINGH,NAVNEET SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT
Adv. G.A.
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Adv. G.A.
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Adv. G.A.
STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. G.A.
MANOJ SINGH MEHRA
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary of WPCRL 1107/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of the petition by directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Udham Singh Nagar, to provide adequate police assistance enabling Kunwar Construction to complete the flood protection wall and channelization work on Banbhudhia Nala without unlawful obstruction. The court found the drainage work a matter of public importance given the approaching monsoon season, without adjudicating the underlying payment dispute between the contractor and respondent no. 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WPCRL 1107/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of the petition by directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Udham Singh Nagar, to provide adequate police assistance enabling Kunwar Construction to complete the flood protection wall and channelization work on Banbhudhia Nala without unlawful obstruction. The court found the drainage work a matter of public importance given the approaching monsoon season, without adjudicating the underlying payment dispute between the contractor and respondent no. 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts