AJAY SHARMA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — ABA/217/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010102722026

Filing Number

ABA/4913/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

ABA/217/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY SHARMA

    Adv. BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI,SANDEEP ADHIKARI,SANDEEP ADHIKARI, ,SANDEEP ADHIKARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

    Adv. G.A.

  4. 4.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

    Adv. G.A.

  5. 5.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

    Adv. G.A.

  6. 6.CIRCLE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  7. 7.CIRCLE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: ABA/217/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court rejected Ajay Sharma's anticipatory bail application, holding that mere apprehension of arrest regarding unregistered and speculative future FIRs lacks legal basis when no cognizable offence or existing criminal proceedings exist. The court found that police had only received complaints about alleged false social media posts and summoned Sharma for preliminary inquiry, but registered no FIR. The court directed the Director General of Police to expeditiously decide Sharma's pending representation within four weeks and noted he could seek appropriate remedies if any cognizable offence is subsequently registered against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  5. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/217/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court rejected Ajay Sharma's anticipatory bail application, holding that mere apprehension of arrest regarding unregistered and speculative future FIRs lacks legal basis when no cognizable offence or existing criminal proceedings exist. The court found that police had only received complaints about alleged false social media posts and summoned Sharma for preliminary inquiry, but registered no FIR. The court directed the Director General of Police to expeditiously decide Sharma's pending representation within four weeks and noted he could seek appropriate remedies if any cognizable offence is subsequently registered against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case