SAGIR AHMAD vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1105/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),332(C),351(2),352,69. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010102642026

Filing Number

WPCRL/4905/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1105/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),332(C),351(2),352,69

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAGIR AHMAD

    Adv. AMREEN BANO,SPARSH GUPTA,SPARSH GUPTA, ,SPARSH GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.AZMI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: WPCRL 1105/2026 The court adjourned the petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 0258/2026 (registered under BNS Sections 191(2), 332(c), 351(2), 352, 69) involving allegations of deception for physical relations, threats regarding a non-consensual intimate video, and extortion. The court found merit in petitioner's argument regarding vague allegations and issued notice to respondent no. 3 (returnable in four weeks). As interim relief, petitioner granted protection from arrest pending investigation cooperation, subject to counter-affidavit filing by respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  5. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1105/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL 1105/2026 The court adjourned the petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 0258/2026 (registered under BNS Sections 191(2), 332(c), 351(2), 352, 69) involving allegations of deception for physical relations, threats regarding a non-consensual intimate video, and extortion. The court found merit in petitioner's argument regarding vague allegations and issued notice to respondent no. 3 (returnable in four weeks). As interim relief, petitioner granted protection from arrest pending investigation cooperation, subject to counter-affidavit filing by respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case