VASEEM AKRAM vs RAVINDRA SINGH — WPMS/1809/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010102612026

Filing Number

WPMS/5356/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1809/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VASEEM AKRAM

    Adv. ABHISHEK VERMA

  2. 2.NADEEM AHMAD

  3. 3.FAHEEM AHMAD

  4. 4.NAEEM AHMAD

  5. 5.ARIF BEGUM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDRA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Trial Court's order that issued notice on the temporary injunction application rather than granting ex parte injunction. The court held that under CPC, issuing notice is the rule and granting temporary injunction without notice is the exception, therefore the Trial Court's approach was legally correct. The petition was disposed with a direction to the Trial Court to consider the petitioner's temporary injunction application on the next hearing date, provided all respondents are properly served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1809/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Trial Court's order that issued notice on the temporary injunction application rather than granting ex parte injunction. The court held that under CPC, issuing notice is the rule and granting temporary injunction without notice is the exception, therefore the Trial Court's approach was legally correct. The petition was disposed with a direction to the Trial Court to consider the petitioner's temporary injunction application on the next hearing date, provided all respondents are properly served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case