SUSHIL KUMAR vs HOFF UTTARAKHAND DEHRADUN Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1548/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010102292026

Filing Number

WPSS/5337/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1548/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHIL KUMAR

    Adv. JAI KRISHNA PANDEY,D C S RAWAT,D C S RAWAT, ,D C S RAWAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HOFF UTTARAKHAND DEHRADUN Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.CONSERVATOR OF FOREST

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.STATE ELECTION COMMISSION

    Adv. SANJAY BHATT

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: WPSS 1548/2026 Sushil Kumar challenged his transfer order dated 04.06.2026 from Tarai Purvi Van Prabhag to Haldwani Van Prabhag, arguing he was on deputation with the Election Commission of India for conducting elections and should not have been transferred. The court granted a stay on the transfer order and adjourned the case to 17.06.2026 for the State to obtain instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1548/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPSS 1548/2026 Sushil Kumar challenged his transfer order dated 04.06.2026 from Tarai Purvi Van Prabhag to Haldwani Van Prabhag, arguing he was on deputation with the Election Commission of India for conducting elections and should not have been transferred. The court granted a stay on the transfer order and adjourned the case to 17.06.2026 for the State to obtain instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case