MS A A TRADERS vs COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COMMISSIONERATE — WPMB/488/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010101982026

Filing Number

WPMB/5316/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMB/488/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT ( 48 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS A A TRADERS

    Adv. SHARIQ KHURSHID

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COMMISSIONERATE

  2. 2.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KASHIPUR

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of M/s A A Traders' writ petition challenging the cancellation of their GST registration for failure to file returns timely. Following a similar precedent, the court permitted the petitioner to file an application for revocation of the cancellation order within two weeks, subject to furnishing all pending returns and depositing unpaid tax with interest and penalty, with the competent authority to decide within four weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMB/488/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of M/s A A Traders' writ petition challenging the cancellation of their GST registration for failure to file returns timely. Following a similar precedent, the court permitted the petitioner to file an application for revocation of the cancellation order within two weeks, subject to furnishing all pending returns and depositing unpaid tax with interest and penalty, with the competent authority to decide within four weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case