YUSUF ALI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1541/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010101612026

Filing Number

WPSS/5303/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1541/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YUSUF ALI

    Adv. VIKAS PANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.ADDI DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: WPSS/1541/2026 - Yusuf Ali v. State of Uttarakhand Yusuf Ali challenged his reversion from Officiating Naib Tehsildar to Registrar Kanungo by the District Magistrate, Haridwar (order dated 05.06.2026), arguing the officiating charge was meant to last 364 days and alleging discriminatory treatment compared to similarly situated employees. The court granted a stay of the reversion order pending further hearing and directed the State to file instructions within 7 days explaining the discriminatory reversion. The case was adjourned to 30.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1541/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPSS/1541/2026 - Yusuf Ali v. State of Uttarakhand Yusuf Ali challenged his reversion from Officiating Naib Tehsildar to Registrar Kanungo by the District Magistrate, Haridwar (order dated 05.06.2026), arguing the officiating charge was meant to last 364 days and alleging discriminatory treatment compared to similarly situated employees. The court granted a stay of the reversion order pending further hearing and directed the State to file instructions within 7 days explaining the discriminatory reversion. The case was adjourned to 30.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case