FAIZ ALAM ALIAS FAIZU vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/1033/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),109(1),115(2)190,191(2),191(3),351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010101492026

Filing Number

BA1/4846/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

BA1/1033/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),109(1),115(2)190,191(2),191(3),351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAIZ ALAM ALIAS FAIZU

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    Case Summary: BA1/1033/2026 Faiz Alam's bail application was rejected by Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal. The applicant sought bail in a case involving charges under BNS 2023 (including criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint) where a death occurred. The court found that the applicant's bail petition contained false assertions claiming the deceased sustained no grievous injury, when medical evidence confirmed fatal injuries; the court noted this misrepresentation had influenced earlier bail grants to co-accused Abdul Rahman and Gulzar, and determined the gravity of the offense precluded bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/1033/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA1/1033/2026 Faiz Alam's bail application was rejected by Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal. The applicant sought bail in a case involving charges under BNS 2023 (including criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint) where a death occurred. The court found that the applicant's bail petition contained false assertions claiming the deceased sustained no grievous injury, when medical evidence confirmed fatal injuries; the court noted this misrepresentation had influenced earlier bail grants to co-accused Abdul Rahman and Gulzar, and determined the gravity of the offense precluded bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case