PALLAVI KANSAL vs HARIDWAR ROORKEE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI — WPMS/1789/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010101222026

Filing Number

WPMS/5288/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1789/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PALLAVI KANSAL

    Adv. MANISH LOHANI,ALOK KUMAR,ALOK KUMAR, ,ALOK KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARIDWAR ROORKEE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI

  2. 2.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

    Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI

  3. 3.ANIL SINGHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari disposed of Pallavi Kansal's writ petition by directing the Secretary of Haridwar Roorkee Development Authority to expedite proceedings initiated under Section 27(1) of the Uttarkhand Urban and Country Planning & Development Act, 1973 against Respondent No. 3, with a six-month deadline from certified copy presentation. The court mandated that affected parties receive reasonable opportunity of hearing before any final order is passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -260

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1789/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari disposed of Pallavi Kansal's writ petition by directing the Secretary of Haridwar Roorkee Development Authority to expedite proceedings initiated under Section 27(1) of the Uttarkhand Urban and Country Planning & Development Act, 1973 against Respondent No. 3, with a six-month deadline from certified copy presentation. The court mandated that affected parties receive reasonable opportunity of hearing before any final order is passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case