ANIL KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1537/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010101202026

Filing Number

WPSS/5287/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1537/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

REGULARIZATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL KUMAR

    Adv. DUSHYANT MAINALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD MUSSOORIE

    Adv. BHUWAN BHATT

  3. 3.CHAIRMAN NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD

    Adv. BHUWAN BHATT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    WPSS/1537/2026 - Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of 19 clubbed writ petitions filed by Group-D employees of Nagar Palika Parishad Mussoorie seeking minimum pay-scale parity with regular establishment employees. The court directed the Nagar Palika Parishad to decide the pending representations of the petitioners (who had worked 13-15 years continuously) within six weeks by a speaking and reasoned order, with no opposition from respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1537/2026

casestatus.in Summary

WPSS/1537/2026 - Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of 19 clubbed writ petitions filed by Group-D employees of Nagar Palika Parishad Mussoorie seeking minimum pay-scale parity with regular establishment employees. The court directed the Nagar Palika Parishad to decide the pending representations of the petitioners (who had worked 13-15 years continuously) within six weeks by a speaking and reasoned order, with no opposition from respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case