DINESH KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — HABC/22/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010101172026
Filing Number
HABC/4831/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
HABC/22/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
WRIT RELATING TO HABEAS CORPUS AGAINST STATE ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DINESH KUMAR
Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL,AVIDIT NOLIYAL, ,AVIDIT NOLIYAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Adv. G.A.
-
3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. G.A.
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF
Case Summary: HABC/22/2026 Petitioner Dinesh Kumar filed a Habeas Corpus writ petition seeking direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Bhagwanpur, to preserve, secure and produce CCTV footages from 01.02.2026 to 04.02.2026. The petitioner's counsel restricted the petition's scope to this prayer, arguing the police are duty-bound to produce the footages per Supreme Court precedent. The State Counsel sought time for instructions, and the case was adjourned to 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. HABC/22/2026
Case Summary: HABC/22/2026 Petitioner Dinesh Kumar filed a Habeas Corpus writ petition seeking direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Bhagwanpur, to preserve, secure and produce CCTV footages from 01.02.2026 to 04.02.2026. The petitioner's counsel restricted the petition's scope to this prayer, arguing the police are duty-bound to produce the footages per Supreme Court precedent. The State Counsel sought time for instructions, and the case was adjourned to 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts