DINESH KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — HABC/22/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010101172026

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

HABC/4831/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

HABC/22/2026

Registration Date

08-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

WRIT RELATING TO HABEAS CORPUS AGAINST STATE ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

DINESH KUMAR

Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL,AVIDIT NOLIYAL, ,AVIDIT NOLIYAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Adv. G.A.

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

10-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

15-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

10-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Case Summary: HABC/22/2026 Petitioner Dinesh Kumar filed a Habeas Corpus writ petition seeking direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Bhagwanpur, to preserve, secure and produce CCTV footages from 01.02.2026 to 04.02.2026. The petitioner's counsel restricted the petition's scope to this prayer, arguing the police are duty-bound to produce the footages per Supreme Court precedent. The State Counsel sought time for instructions, and the case was adjourned to 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: HABC/22/2026 Petitioner Dinesh Kumar filed a Habeas Corpus writ petition seeking direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Bhagwanpur, to preserve, secure and produce CCTV footages from 01.02.2026 to 04.02.2026. The petitioner's counsel restricted the petition's scope to this prayer, arguing the police are duty-bound to produce the footages per Supreme Court precedent. The State Counsel sought time for instructions, and the case was adjourned to 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case