MOHAMMAD SHAMIN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1535/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010101112026
Filing Number
WPSS/5282/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1535/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
TRANSFER ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMAD SHAMIN
Adv. VINOD NAUTIYAL,APOORV NAUTIYAL,APOORV NAUTIYAL, ,APOORV NAUTIYAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
CHIEF TREASURER OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
ASSISTANT TREASURER OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Mohammad Shamin's writ petition challenging his transfer order from Treasury, Udham Singh Nagar to Sub-treasury, Khatima dated 06.06.2025. The court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 because the transfer order had already been executed and the petitioner approached the court after a one-year delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Mohammad Shamin's writ petition challenging his transfer order from Treasury, Udham Singh Nagar to Sub-treasury, Khatima dated 06.06.2025. The court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 because the transfer order had already been executed and the petitioner approached the court after a one-year delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts