MS I TECH PACKAGING SYSTEMS vs SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT Advocate - SHOBHIT SAHARIA — WPMB/481/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010100942026
Filing Number
WPMB/5270/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPMB/481/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT ( 48 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MS I TECH PACKAGING SYSTEMS
Adv. PIYUSH GARG
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT Advocate - SHOBHIT SAHARIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed M/s I. Tech Packaging Systems' petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration for non-filing of returns. Following a similar precedent, the court permitted the petitioner to file an application for revocation of the cancellation order within two weeks, conditional upon furnishing pending returns and depositing unpaid tax with interest and penalty; the competent authority must decide the revocation application within four weeks of receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMB/481/2026
The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed M/s I. Tech Packaging Systems' petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration for non-filing of returns. Following a similar precedent, the court permitted the petitioner to file an application for revocation of the cancellation order within two weeks, conditional upon furnishing pending returns and depositing unpaid tax with interest and penalty; the competent authority must decide the revocation application within four weeks of receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts