MS I TECH PACKAGING SYSTEMS vs SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT Advocate - SHOBHIT SAHARIA — WPMB/481/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010100942026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMB/5270/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

WPMB/481/2026

Registration Date

08-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT ( 48 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

MS I TECH PACKAGING SYSTEMS

Adv. PIYUSH GARG

Respondent(s)

SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT Advocate - SHOBHIT SAHARIA

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

10-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

10-06-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed M/s I. Tech Packaging Systems' petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration for non-filing of returns. Following a similar precedent, the court permitted the petitioner to file an application for revocation of the cancellation order within two weeks, conditional upon furnishing pending returns and depositing unpaid tax with interest and penalty; the competent authority must decide the revocation application within four weeks of receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed M/s I. Tech Packaging Systems' petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration for non-filing of returns. Following a similar precedent, the court permitted the petitioner to file an application for revocation of the cancellation order within two weeks, conditional upon furnishing pending returns and depositing unpaid tax with interest and penalty; the competent authority must decide the revocation application within four weeks of receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case