SWAMI HITESHWARANAND SARASWATI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/437/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438/442. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010100882026

Filing Number

CRLR/4820/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLR/437/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISIONS ( 4 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438/442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWAMI HITESHWARANAND SARASWATI

    Adv. NAMAN KAMBOJ,KAJRI GUPTA,KAJRI GUPTA, ,KAJRI GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MANOHAR LAL SHARMA

  3. 3.SMT. SUMITI DEVI

  4. 4.INDRAJEET SINGH SHARMA

  5. 5.DALEEP KUMAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLR No. 437/2026 In this criminal revision petition filed by Swami Hiteshwaranand Saraswati against the State of Uttarakhand and others, the court (Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.) issued notices to respondent nos. 2-5 on the petitioner's delay condonation application dated 12.06.2026. The matter was adjourned pending service of notices, with directions for the State Counsel to file any objections to the delay condonation application in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/437/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLR No. 437/2026 In this criminal revision petition filed by Swami Hiteshwaranand Saraswati against the State of Uttarakhand and others, the court (Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.) issued notices to respondent nos. 2-5 on the petitioner's delay condonation application dated 12.06.2026. The matter was adjourned pending service of notices, with directions for the State Counsel to file any objections to the delay condonation application in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case