MOHD SHAMSHAD vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1085/2026
Case under Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 (Act No. 20 of 2019) Section 3/4. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010100742026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
WPCRL/4812/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/1085/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
FIR QUASHING ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHD SHAMSHAD
Adv. GAURAV SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. G.A.
SMT. SHABNAM
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPCRL/1085/2026 Outcome: The court granted interim protection against arrest. Petitioner Mohd Shamshad sought to quash an F.I.R. for allegedly pronouncing "triple talaq" under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, and related offences. The court found arguable issues requiring consideration and issued notice to respondent Shabnam (returnable in four weeks). As an interim measure, the court directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested pending further hearing, provided he cooperates with investigation and remains available to the Investigating Officer. The matter was adjourned for next listing upon receipt of service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPCRL/1085/2026 Outcome: The court granted interim protection against arrest. Petitioner Mohd Shamshad sought to quash an F.I.R. for allegedly pronouncing "triple talaq" under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, and related offences. The court found arguable issues requiring consideration and issued notice to respondent Shabnam (returnable in four weeks). As an interim measure, the court directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested pending further hearing, provided he cooperates with investigation and remains available to the Investigating Officer. The matter was adjourned for next listing upon receipt of service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts