VINEET KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1529/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010100702026

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

Filing Number

WPSS/5259/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1529/2026

Registration Date

08-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

VINEET KUMAR

Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR CHAUHAN,NAVEEN SINGH MER,NAVEEN SINGH MER, ,NAVEEN SINGH MER

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

DIRECTOR

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

10-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

30-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

10-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Case Summary: WPSS/1529/2026 Vineet Kumar challenged his exclusion from Assistant Teacher selection in District Pithoragarh despite scoring 81.50 quality points, higher than a selected candidate with 77.42 points. The court granted interim relief by directing that one Assistant Teacher post (Science Group) under General Category be kept vacant in District Pithoragarh, and adjourned the case to 30.06.2026 for the State to submit its response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPSS/1529/2026 Vineet Kumar challenged his exclusion from Assistant Teacher selection in District Pithoragarh despite scoring 81.50 quality points, higher than a selected candidate with 77.42 points. The court granted interim relief by directing that one Assistant Teacher post (Science Group) under General Category be kept vacant in District Pithoragarh, and adjourned the case to 30.06.2026 for the State to submit its response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case