MAASHEETLA VENTURE LIMITED vs INDIAN BANK Advocate - AJAY SINGH BISHT — WPMS/1781/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010100652026

Filing Number

WPMS/5256/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1781/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAASHEETLA VENTURE LIMITED

    Adv. SHOBHIT SAHARIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDIAN BANK Advocate - AJAY SINGH BISHT

  2. 2.BRANCH MANAGER

    Adv. AJAY SINGH BISHT

  3. 3.M/S AAR AND CO CHARTERED ACCOUNTANS

  4. 4.RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    Case Summary: WPMS/1781/2026 The court dismissed Maasheetla Venture Limited's writ petition challenging Indian Bank's initiation of a forensic audit on the company and its group concerns. While the court declined to interfere with the forensic audit itself, it imposed a condition that the bank must strictly comply with the master circular dated 15.07.2024 without any deviation from its provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -260

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1781/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS/1781/2026 The court dismissed Maasheetla Venture Limited's writ petition challenging Indian Bank's initiation of a forensic audit on the company and its group concerns. While the court declined to interfere with the forensic audit itself, it imposed a condition that the bank must strictly comply with the master circular dated 15.07.2024 without any deviation from its provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case