DHANA DEOPA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/1782/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010100622026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMS/5255/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1782/2026

Registration Date

08-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

DHANA DEOPA

Adv. D S MEHTA,KETAN ASWAL,KETAN ASWAL, ,KETAN ASWAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

TEHSILDAR

Adv. C.S.C.

AUTHORIZED OFFICER

Adv. ASHISH JOSHI

STUTHI MINERALS PVT LTD

MAHESH JOSHI

SHARIK RAHMAN KHAN

BHUPESH JOSHI

FIZA DURRANI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

10-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -260

Orders

10-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Case Summary: WPMS/1782/2026 Petitioner Dhana Deopa sought to halt bank auction proceedings on mortgaged land by filing a declaratory suit under Section 229-B of the Zamindari Abolition Act, 1950. The court disposed of the writ petition, finding the matter inappropriate for writ jurisdiction and instead directed the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 within fifteen days, consistent with the borrower's previous direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS/1782/2026 Petitioner Dhana Deopa sought to halt bank auction proceedings on mortgaged land by filing a declaratory suit under Section 229-B of the Zamindari Abolition Act, 1950. The court disposed of the writ petition, finding the matter inappropriate for writ jurisdiction and instead directed the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 within fifteen days, consistent with the borrower's previous direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case