RAJKUMAR DHINGRA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1524/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010100582026

Filing Number

WPSS/5253/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1524/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PENSION MATTER ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJKUMAR DHINGRA

    Adv. DEVANG DOBHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.DIRECTOR

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.SECRETARY

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of 12 identical writ petitions filed by pharmacists appointed in 2006 who were denied Old Pension Scheme benefits. The petitioners argued they were entitled to the Old Pension Scheme as they were appointed pursuant to a 2005 selection process for vacancies originally advertised in 2000, with age relaxation granted. The court permitted petitioners to file fresh representations within 10 days, directing the competent authority to decide within four months thereafter by passing reasoned orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1524/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of 12 identical writ petitions filed by pharmacists appointed in 2006 who were denied Old Pension Scheme benefits. The petitioners argued they were entitled to the Old Pension Scheme as they were appointed pursuant to a 2005 selection process for vacancies originally advertised in 2000, with age relaxation granted. The court permitted petitioners to file fresh representations within 10 days, directing the competent authority to decide within four months thereafter by passing reasoned orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case