RAJKUMAR DHINGRA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1524/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010100582026
Filing Number
WPSS/5253/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1524/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
PENSION MATTER ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJKUMAR DHINGRA
Adv. DEVANG DOBHAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
SECRETARY
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of 12 identical writ petitions filed by pharmacists appointed in 2006 who were denied Old Pension Scheme benefits. The petitioners argued they were entitled to the Old Pension Scheme as they were appointed pursuant to a 2005 selection process for vacancies originally advertised in 2000, with age relaxation granted. The court permitted petitioners to file fresh representations within 10 days, directing the competent authority to decide within four months thereafter by passing reasoned orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Uttarakhand High Court disposed of 12 identical writ petitions filed by pharmacists appointed in 2006 who were denied Old Pension Scheme benefits. The petitioners argued they were entitled to the Old Pension Scheme as they were appointed pursuant to a 2005 selection process for vacancies originally advertised in 2000, with age relaxation granted. The court permitted petitioners to file fresh representations within 10 days, directing the competent authority to decide within four months thereafter by passing reasoned orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts