KISHAN SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1078/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010100522026

Filing Number

WPCRL/4802/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1078/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHAN SINGH

    Adv. MANISHA BHANDARI,PRITISH ARYA,PRITISH ARYA, ,SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY,SHASHWAT SIDHANT,PRITISH ARYA

  2. 2.RANEES AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.SUPERINTENDENT

    Adv. G.A.

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    WPCRL/1078/2026 Summary Petitioners Kishan Singh and Ranees Ahmed sought premature release, claiming eligibility under Uttarakhand's premature release policy, but their cases were not recommended. The court adjourned the matter to 17.06.2026 and directed the State Counsel to provide a categorical explanation for denying their premature release recommendation despite apparent policy eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1078/2026

casestatus.in Summary

WPCRL/1078/2026 Summary Petitioners Kishan Singh and Ranees Ahmed sought premature release, claiming eligibility under Uttarakhand's premature release policy, but their cases were not recommended. The court adjourned the matter to 17.06.2026 and directed the State Counsel to provide a categorical explanation for denying their premature release recommendation despite apparent policy eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case