NAGENDRA DUTT SEMWAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1521/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010100472026
Filing Number
WPSS/5246/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1521/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
PENSION MATTER ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAGENDRA DUTT SEMWAL
Adv. DEVANG DOBHAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
SECRETARY
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPSS/1521/2026 The court disposed of twelve consolidated writ petitions filed by pharmacists appointed to Uttarakhand's Ayush Department in 2006, who were denied Old Pension Scheme benefits. The petitioners argued they were entitled to the Old Pension Scheme since they were selected in 2005 (from vacancies advertised in 2000) and appointed in 2006, citing a November 2023 Government Order. The state did not oppose permitting fresh representations. The court allowed petitioners to file fresh representations within ten days, with the competent authority required to decide within four months thereafter by issuing a detailed reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPSS/1521/2026 The court disposed of twelve consolidated writ petitions filed by pharmacists appointed to Uttarakhand's Ayush Department in 2006, who were denied Old Pension Scheme benefits. The petitioners argued they were entitled to the Old Pension Scheme since they were selected in 2005 (from vacancies advertised in 2000) and appointed in 2006, citing a November 2023 Government Order. The state did not oppose permitting fresh representations. The court allowed petitioners to file fresh representations within ten days, with the competent authority required to decide within four months thereafter by issuing a detailed reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts