DEVANG KUMAR MISHRA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1522/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010100462026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSS/5245/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1522/2026

Registration Date

08-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PENSION MATTER ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

DEVANG KUMAR MISHRA

Adv. DEVANG DOBHAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

DIRECTOR

Adv. C.S.C.

SECRETARY

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

10-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

10-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

The court disposed of the writ petitions by permitting petitioners appointed as Pharmacists in 2006 to file fresh representations seeking Old Pension Scheme benefits within ten days. The state agreed to consider the representations on merit, with a decision to be rendered within four months by a reasoned order, based on the petitioners' argument that they were entitled to the old scheme due to age relaxation given in a 2005 selection process linked to a 2000 advertisement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the writ petitions by permitting petitioners appointed as Pharmacists in 2006 to file fresh representations seeking Old Pension Scheme benefits within ten days. The state agreed to consider the representations on merit, with a decision to be rendered within four months by a reasoned order, based on the petitioners' argument that they were entitled to the old scheme due to age relaxation given in a 2005 selection process linked to a 2000 advertisement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case