OMPAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1507/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010100262026
Filing Number
WPSS/5239/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1507/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
REGULARIZATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.OMPAL
Adv. DUSHYANT MAINALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD MUSSOORIE
Adv. BHUWAN BHATT
-
3.CHAIRMAN
Adv. BHUWAN BHATT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
The High Court of Uttarakhand directed Nagar Palika Parishad, Mussoorie, to decide pending representations filed by Group-D employees within six weeks, sympathetically and in accordance with law. The employees, working since 2011-2013, sought parity pay-scales with regular Group-D staff; the Court granted relief as the respondent did not oppose the modest request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/1507/2026
The High Court of Uttarakhand directed Nagar Palika Parishad, Mussoorie, to decide pending representations filed by Group-D employees within six weeks, sympathetically and in accordance with law. The employees, working since 2011-2013, sought parity pay-scales with regular Group-D staff; the Court granted relief as the respondent did not oppose the modest request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts