OMPAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1501/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010100162026
Filing Number
WPSS/5229/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1501/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
REGULARIZATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.OMPAL
Adv. DUSHYANT MAINALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD MUSSOORIE
Adv. BHUWAN BHATT
-
3.CHAIRMAN
Adv. BHUWAN BHATT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: WPSS/1501/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of consolidated writ petitions filed by Group-D employees of Nagar Palika Parishad, Mussoorie, who sought minimum pay-scale parity with regular establishment employees after 13-15 years of continuous service. The court directed the Nagar Palika Parishad to decide the petitioners' pending representations within six weeks in accordance with law by a reasoned order, with no opposition from respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/1501/2026
Case Summary: WPSS/1501/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of consolidated writ petitions filed by Group-D employees of Nagar Palika Parishad, Mussoorie, who sought minimum pay-scale parity with regular establishment employees after 13-15 years of continuous service. The court directed the Nagar Palika Parishad to decide the petitioners' pending representations within six weeks in accordance with law by a reasoned order, with no opposition from respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts