PUSHKAR PAL SINGH BISHT vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1498/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010100092026

Filing Number

WPSS/5224/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1498/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUSHKAR PAL SINGH BISHT

    Adv. RAVI BISHT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.ENGINEER IN CHIEF

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: WPSS/1498/2026 Petitioner: Pushkar Pal Singh Bisht Respondents: State of Uttarakhand and Engineer in Chief The court granted interim protection to the petitioner, a contractual Junior Engineer discontinued after nearly 10 years of service. Justice Pankaj Purohit ordered that if work and post are available, the petitioner's re-engagement shall be considered and he may continue as a contractual Junior Engineer, though the employer retains liberty to fill vacancies through regular appointments. The State was directed to file a counter-affidavit within six weeks, with the case listed for further hearing alongside WPSS No.321 of 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1498/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPSS/1498/2026 Petitioner: Pushkar Pal Singh Bisht Respondents: State of Uttarakhand and Engineer in Chief The court granted interim protection to the petitioner, a contractual Junior Engineer discontinued after nearly 10 years of service. Justice Pankaj Purohit ordered that if work and post are available, the petitioner's re-engagement shall be considered and he may continue as a contractual Junior Engineer, though the employer retains liberty to fill vacancies through regular appointments. The State was directed to file a counter-affidavit within six weeks, with the case listed for further hearing alongside WPSS No.321 of 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case