SUNNY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1493/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010099992026
Filing Number
WPSS/5219/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1493/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
REGULARIZATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNNY
Adv. DUSHYANT MAINALI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD MUSSOORIE
Adv. BHUWAN BHATT
CHAIRMAN
Adv. BHUWAN BHATT
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of 19 clubbed writ petitions filed by Group-D employees of Nagar Palika Parishad, Mussoorie, who had worked for 13-15 years without regular pay-scale parity. The court directed the Nagar Palika Parishad to decide the petitioners' pending representations within six weeks with reasoned, sympathetic orders, as the respondent offered no opposition to this relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of 19 clubbed writ petitions filed by Group-D employees of Nagar Palika Parishad, Mussoorie, who had worked for 13-15 years without regular pay-scale parity. The court directed the Nagar Palika Parishad to decide the petitioners' pending representations within six weeks with reasoned, sympathetic orders, as the respondent offered no opposition to this relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts