AJAY KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1074/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),84. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010099982026

Filing Number

WPCRL/4779/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1074/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),84
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (Act No. 28 of 1961) Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY KUMAR

    Adv. RAVI BISHT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.SHRI RAJVEER SHARMA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: WPCRL/1074/2026 Outcome: The petition was adjourned for further deliberation. The court issued notice to respondent no. 3 (returnable within four weeks) and directed the State to file a counter-affidavit. As an interim measure, the petitioner was granted protection from arrest in relation to the FIR, conditional on his cooperation with the investigation. The stay application was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1074/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL/1074/2026 Outcome: The petition was adjourned for further deliberation. The court issued notice to respondent no. 3 (returnable within four weeks) and directed the State to file a counter-affidavit. As an interim measure, the petitioner was granted protection from arrest in relation to the FIR, conditional on his cooperation with the investigation. The stay application was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case