GOVIND PRAKASH SHARMA vs SANDEEP TIWARI — CLCON/327/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010099972026

Filing Number

CLCON/5218/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

CLCON/327/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVIND PRAKASH SHARMA

    Adv. MAHENDRA SINGH RAWAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP TIWARI

  2. 2.PRATEEK JAIN

  3. 3.DHEERAJ SINGH GARBIYAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: CLCON/327/2026 The court dismissed Govind Prakash Sharma's contempt petition against Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam. Sharma alleged the Corporation willfully violated a December 23, 2025 court order requiring it to decide on mitigating his hardship within four months. However, the court found no contempt as the Corporation's April 13, 2026 decision was based on an earlier Board decision dated August 28, 2025. The court directed the petitioner to pursue other appropriate remedies if aggrieved by the Corporation's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/327/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CLCON/327/2026 The court dismissed Govind Prakash Sharma's contempt petition against Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam. Sharma alleged the Corporation willfully violated a December 23, 2025 court order requiring it to decide on mitigating his hardship within four months. However, the court found no contempt as the Corporation's April 13, 2026 decision was based on an earlier Board decision dated August 28, 2025. The court directed the petitioner to pursue other appropriate remedies if aggrieved by the Corporation's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case