ABHREY RAJ vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1492/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010099882026
Filing Number
WPSS/5214/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1492/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
TRANSFER ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABHREY RAJ
Adv. HARI MOHAN BHATIA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
DIRECTOR GENERAL
Adv. C.S.C.
DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPSS 1492/2026 The court dismissed Abhrey Raj's writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the State of Uttarakhand to sympathetically consider his representation. Raj, an Assistant Teacher (Physical Education) with hearing disability, was attached to P.M. Shri Government Inter College after his initial appointment, and filed the petition based on apprehension of potential transfer during the transfer season. Justice Pankaj Purohit found the petition premature and lacking cause of action, holding that prospective fears of administrative action do not constitute grounds for judicial intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPSS 1492/2026 The court dismissed Abhrey Raj's writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the State of Uttarakhand to sympathetically consider his representation. Raj, an Assistant Teacher (Physical Education) with hearing disability, was attached to P.M. Shri Government Inter College after his initial appointment, and filed the petition based on apprehension of potential transfer during the transfer season. Justice Pankaj Purohit found the petition premature and lacking cause of action, holding that prospective fears of administrative action do not constitute grounds for judicial intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts