MS RV ENTERPRISES vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMB/479/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010099862026
Filing Number
WPMB/5213/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPMB/479/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT ( 48 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MS RV ENTERPRISES
Adv. ESHAN SACHDEVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: MS RV ENTERPRISES v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of MS RV Enterprises' petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration for non-filing of returns. Following a coordinate bench precedent with identical facts, the court permitted the petitioner to file a revocation application within two weeks and deposit all pending returns along with unpaid tax, interest, and penalty. The competent authority must then decide the revocation application within four weeks, with the respondent state consenting to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMB/479/2026
Case Summary: MS RV ENTERPRISES v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of MS RV Enterprises' petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration for non-filing of returns. Following a coordinate bench precedent with identical facts, the court permitted the petitioner to file a revocation application within two weeks and deposit all pending returns along with unpaid tax, interest, and penalty. The competent authority must then decide the revocation application within four weeks, with the respondent state consenting to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts