MS RV ENTERPRISES vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMB/479/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010099862026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMB/5213/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

WPMB/479/2026

Registration Date

08-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT ( 48 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

MS RV ENTERPRISES

Adv. ESHAN SACHDEVA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

10-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

10-06-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Case Summary: MS RV ENTERPRISES v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of MS RV Enterprises' petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration for non-filing of returns. Following a coordinate bench precedent with identical facts, the court permitted the petitioner to file a revocation application within two weeks and deposit all pending returns along with unpaid tax, interest, and penalty. The competent authority must then decide the revocation application within four weeks, with the respondent state consenting to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MS RV ENTERPRISES v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of MS RV Enterprises' petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration for non-filing of returns. Following a coordinate bench precedent with identical facts, the court permitted the petitioner to file a revocation application within two weeks and deposit all pending returns along with unpaid tax, interest, and penalty. The competent authority must then decide the revocation application within four weeks, with the respondent state consenting to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case