ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD vs CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE — WPMS/1773/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010099842026
Filing Number
WPMS/5211/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1773/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
SARFAI ACT- RECOVERIES AND AUCTION BY THE BANK ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD
Adv. SIDDHARTH JAIN
Respondent(s)
CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -260
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -260 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPMS/1773/2026 ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd sought execution of a Chief Judicial Magistrate's order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, claiming non-delivery of physical possession of the secured asset. The court declined to issue the requested direction but disposed of the petition by permitting the petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority within two weeks, with the authority required to decide the matter within six weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPMS/1773/2026 ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd sought execution of a Chief Judicial Magistrate's order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, claiming non-delivery of physical possession of the secured asset. The court declined to issue the requested direction but disposed of the petition by permitting the petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority within two weeks, with the authority required to decide the matter within six weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts