SANJEEV GUPTA vs LAXMAN SINGH — WPMS/1774/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010099822026

Filing Number

WPMS/5210/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1774/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV GUPTA

    Adv. PIYUSH GARG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAXMAN SINGH

  2. 2.SRI CHANDRA KISHORE BADONI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    Case Summary: WPMS/1774/2026 The High Court dismissed Sanjeev Gupta's writ petition seeking protection while his appeal against the Trial Court's order was pending before the Appellate Court. The court found that since the Trial Court had already determined that Gupta failed to establish a prima facie case—a finding under appellate challenge—it would be improper for the High Court to intervene at that stage. The petition was disposed of with a request to the Appellate Authority to expedite its decision on Gupta's interim relief application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1774/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS/1774/2026 The High Court dismissed Sanjeev Gupta's writ petition seeking protection while his appeal against the Trial Court's order was pending before the Appellate Court. The court found that since the Trial Court had already determined that Gupta failed to establish a prima facie case—a finding under appellate challenge—it would be improper for the High Court to intervene at that stage. The petition was disposed of with a request to the Appellate Authority to expedite its decision on Gupta's interim relief application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case