DIYA SHARMA vs HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA Advocate - SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL — WPMB/478/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010099752026
Filing Number
WPMB/5203/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPMB/478/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
ADMISSIONS IN MEDICAL, NURSING, PARA-MEDICAL COURSES ( 82 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIYA SHARMA
Adv. SHUBHANG DOBHAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA Advocate - SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL
-
2.GAUTAM BUDDHA CHIKTSA MAHAVIDAYALAYA
-
3.RAS BIHARI BOSE SUBHARTI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: WPMB/478/2026 On 10.06.2026, the court (Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. and Hon'ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.) adjourned the case to the first week of July 2026. The petitioner's counsel was directed to implead the National Medical Commission as a party respondent and serve notice within three days. Notices were issued to respondents 2 and 3 by speed post, and respondents were directed to file counter affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMB/478/2026
Case Summary: WPMB/478/2026 On 10.06.2026, the court (Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. and Hon'ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.) adjourned the case to the first week of July 2026. The petitioner's counsel was directed to implead the National Medical Commission as a party respondent and serve notice within three days. Notices were issued to respondents 2 and 3 by speed post, and respondents were directed to file counter affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts