DIYA SHARMA vs HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA Advocate - SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL — WPMB/478/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010099752026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WPMB/5203/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

WPMB/478/2026

Registration Date

08-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

ADMISSIONS IN MEDICAL, NURSING, PARA-MEDICAL COURSES ( 82 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

DIYA SHARMA

Adv. SHUBHANG DOBHAL

Respondent(s)

HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA Advocate - SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL

GAUTAM BUDDHA CHIKTSA MAHAVIDAYALAYA

RAS BIHARI BOSE SUBHARTI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

10-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

10-06-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Case Summary: WPMB/478/2026 On 10.06.2026, the court (Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. and Hon'ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.) adjourned the case to the first week of July 2026. The petitioner's counsel was directed to implead the National Medical Commission as a party respondent and serve notice within three days. Notices were issued to respondents 2 and 3 by speed post, and respondents were directed to file counter affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMB/478/2026 On 10.06.2026, the court (Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. and Hon'ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.) adjourned the case to the first week of July 2026. The petitioner's counsel was directed to implead the National Medical Commission as a party respondent and serve notice within three days. Notices were issued to respondents 2 and 3 by speed post, and respondents were directed to file counter affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case