MANOJ SINGH KALAKOTI M S DHAPOLA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1068/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010099652026

Filing Number

WPCRL/4769/2026

Filing Date

06-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1068/2026

Registration Date

06-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ SINGH KALAKOTI M S DHAPOLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.DASRATHI GARVYAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: WPCRL/1068/2026 The petitioners sought to quash an FIR against them. The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Station House Officer at Police Station Mukhani, District Nainital, and the Investigating Officer to comply with Supreme Court guidelines from Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before proceeding with any arrest of the petitioner. The State Counsel raised no objection to this direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 06-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1068/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL/1068/2026 The petitioners sought to quash an FIR against them. The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Station House Officer at Police Station Mukhani, District Nainital, and the Investigating Officer to comply with Supreme Court guidelines from Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before proceeding with any arrest of the petitioner. The State Counsel raised no objection to this direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case