SHAHID ALIAS SHAHID HUSAIN ALIAS LOVELY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1081/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 302,148. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 11th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010099622026
Filing Number
BAST/4768/2026
Filing Date
06-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/1081/2026
Registration Date
06-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
PAROLE/SHORT TERM BAIL ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAHID ALIAS SHAHID HUSAIN ALIAS LOVELY
Adv. AJEET KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.THE SUPERINTENDENT
Adv. G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF
The writ petition filed by Shahid alias Shahid Husain alias Lovely against the State of Uttarakhand was disposed of on 11.06.2026 as the petitioner had already been released on parole, rendering the petition devoid of subject matter. The court found no surviving issues requiring adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
-
11-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF
-
10-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPCRL/1081/2026
The writ petition filed by Shahid alias Shahid Husain alias Lovely against the State of Uttarakhand was disposed of on 11.06.2026 as the petitioner had already been released on parole, rendering the petition devoid of subject matter. The court found no surviving issues requiring adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts