BRIJMOHAN vs HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA GARHWAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY Advocate - DR. KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA — WPSS/1490/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010099452026
Filing Number
WPSS/5178/2026
Filing Date
05-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1490/2026
Registration Date
05-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
PROMOTION ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRIJMOHAN
Adv. VINOD NAUTIYAL,APOORV NAUTIYAL,APOORV NAUTIYAL, ,APOORV NAUTIYAL
-
2.TRIVEDI CHANDRA
-
3.RAKESH KUMAR
-
4.MURLIDHAR GHILDIYAL
-
5.MASTAN SINGH RAWAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA GARHWAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY Advocate - DR. KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA
-
2.VICE CHANCELLOR
Adv. DR. KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: WPSS 1490/2026 Three Multi Task Staff (MTS) employees at Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal Central University sought promotion to Lower Division Clerk (LDC) positions after 25 years of service, claiming other employees received such promotions. The case was adjourned to 29.06.2026 as the university requested ten days to obtain instructions on whether the petitioners could be considered for promotion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/1490/2026
Case Summary: WPSS 1490/2026 Three Multi Task Staff (MTS) employees at Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal Central University sought promotion to Lower Division Clerk (LDC) positions after 25 years of service, claiming other employees received such promotions. The case was adjourned to 29.06.2026 as the university requested ten days to obtain instructions on whether the petitioners could be considered for promotion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts