BRIJMOHAN vs HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA GARHWAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY Advocate - DR. KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA — WPSS/1490/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010099452026

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Number

WPSS/5178/2026

Filing Date

05-06-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1490/2026

Registration Date

05-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

BRIJMOHAN

Adv. VINOD NAUTIYAL,APOORV NAUTIYAL,APOORV NAUTIYAL, ,APOORV NAUTIYAL

TRIVEDI CHANDRA

RAKESH KUMAR

MURLIDHAR GHILDIYAL

MASTAN SINGH RAWAT

Respondent(s)

HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA GARHWAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY Advocate - DR. KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA

VICE CHANCELLOR

Adv. DR. KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

09-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

29-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

09-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Case Summary: WPSS 1490/2026 Three Multi Task Staff (MTS) employees at Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal Central University sought promotion to Lower Division Clerk (LDC) positions after 25 years of service, claiming other employees received such promotions. The case was adjourned to 29.06.2026 as the university requested ten days to obtain instructions on whether the petitioners could be considered for promotion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPSS 1490/2026 Three Multi Task Staff (MTS) employees at Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal Central University sought promotion to Lower Division Clerk (LDC) positions after 25 years of service, claiming other employees received such promotions. The case was adjourned to 29.06.2026 as the university requested ten days to obtain instructions on whether the petitioners could be considered for promotion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case