POOJA THAPA vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEPUTY S.G. — WPSS/1484/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010099192026

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

WPSS/5161/2026

Filing Date

05-06-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1484/2026

Registration Date

05-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

REGULARIZATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

POOJA THAPA

Adv. KARAN ANAND,SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL,SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL, ,SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEPUTY S.G.

ADDITIONAL SECRETARY

Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

SECRETARY

Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

DEPUTY DIRECTOR

Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

DIRECTOR

QUANTO ACTIVE MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

09-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

16-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

09-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Case Summary: WPSS 1484/2026 - POOJA THAPA v. UNION OF INDIA Pooja Thapa, engaged as Lower Division Clerk at Institute of Cooperative Management (ICM) since 2011, challenged multiple changes to her employment status—from regular to outsourced to contractual and back to outsourced. The court identified the central issue: whether ICM qualifies as "the State" under constitutional law. The court adjourned the matter, directing respondents' counsel to clarify ICM's status within one week, with next hearing on 16.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPSS 1484/2026 - POOJA THAPA v. UNION OF INDIA Pooja Thapa, engaged as Lower Division Clerk at Institute of Cooperative Management (ICM) since 2011, challenged multiple changes to her employment status—from regular to outsourced to contractual and back to outsourced. The court identified the central issue: whether ICM qualifies as "the State" under constitutional law. The court adjourned the matter, directing respondents' counsel to clarify ICM's status within one week, with next hearing on 16.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case