SAINA vs UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LIMITED Advocate - DHARMENDRA BARTHWAL — WPMS/1761/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010098872026

Filing Number

WPMS/5154/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1761/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAINA

    Adv. TAJHAR QAYYUM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LIMITED Advocate - DHARMENDRA BARTHWAL

  2. 2.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

    Adv. DHARMENDRA BARTHWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    Case Summary: WPMS/1761/2026 Petitioner Saina sought a writ of mandamus against Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited to compel the release of an electricity connection at Rukutt Compound, Mallital, Nainital, which had been withheld despite her application. The court found that both parties agreed a similar issue had been previously decided in Writ Petition No. 2620 of 2025 and, based on this consensus, disposed of the petition in accordance with the judgment dated 11.09.2025 in that earlier case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1761/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS/1761/2026 Petitioner Saina sought a writ of mandamus against Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited to compel the release of an electricity connection at Rukutt Compound, Mallital, Nainital, which had been withheld despite her application. The court found that both parties agreed a similar issue had been previously decided in Writ Petition No. 2620 of 2025 and, based on this consensus, disposed of the petition in accordance with the judgment dated 11.09.2025 in that earlier case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case