LAKHA SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/1762/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010098852026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMS/5153/2026

Filing Date

05-06-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1762/2026

Registration Date

05-06-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

LAKHA SINGH

Adv. TAJHAR QAYYUM,HIMANSHU AGARWAL,HIMANSHU AGARWAL, ,HIMANSHU AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

09-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

09-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Summary of WPMS/1762/2026: Lakha Singh sought regularisation of his unauthorised occupation of government land under a 2018 Government Order scheme, submitting his application on 07.02.2020. The State argued the scheme expired on 18.02.2019, making his belated application ineligible. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari disposed of the petition by directing the Secretary of Revenue to consider and decide the application within one year, without addressing the temporal eligibility issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPMS/1762/2026: Lakha Singh sought regularisation of his unauthorised occupation of government land under a 2018 Government Order scheme, submitting his application on 07.02.2020. The State argued the scheme expired on 18.02.2019, making his belated application ineligible. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari disposed of the petition by directing the Secretary of Revenue to consider and decide the application within one year, without addressing the temporal eligibility issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case