LAKHA SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/1762/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010098852026
Filing Number
WPMS/5153/2026
Filing Date
05-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1762/2026
Registration Date
05-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAKHA SINGH
Adv. TAJHAR QAYYUM,HIMANSHU AGARWAL,HIMANSHU AGARWAL, ,HIMANSHU AGARWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
Summary of WPMS/1762/2026: Lakha Singh sought regularisation of his unauthorised occupation of government land under a 2018 Government Order scheme, submitting his application on 07.02.2020. The State argued the scheme expired on 18.02.2019, making his belated application ineligible. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari disposed of the petition by directing the Secretary of Revenue to consider and decide the application within one year, without addressing the temporal eligibility issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
05-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/1762/2026
Summary of WPMS/1762/2026: Lakha Singh sought regularisation of his unauthorised occupation of government land under a 2018 Government Order scheme, submitting his application on 07.02.2020. The State argued the scheme expired on 18.02.2019, making his belated application ineligible. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari disposed of the petition by directing the Secretary of Revenue to consider and decide the application within one year, without addressing the temporal eligibility issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts