MOHAN SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — ABA/200/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),338,319(2),61(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010098182026
Filing Number
ABA/4696/2026
Filing Date
04-Jun-2026
Registration No
ABA/200/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAN SINGH
Adv. S R S GILL,MILIND RAJ,MILIND RAJ, ,KUNDAN SINGH,MILIND RAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/200/2026 - Mohan Singh v. State of Uttarakhand Decision: The Uttarakhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mohan Singh in connection with FIR No. 36/2025 (involving alleged forged documents and fabricated power of attorney in a land transaction). The court found that Singh, though not originally named in the FIR, qualified for bail protection based on his status as an allegedly bona fide purchaser, the documentary nature of the case, completion of investigation, and the absence of need for custodial interrogation. Conditions: Bail is conditional upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties, cooperating with investigation, maintaining regular court appearance, not tampering with evidence, not leaving India without permission, and maintaining good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/200/2026
Case Summary: ABA/200/2026 - Mohan Singh v. State of Uttarakhand Decision: The Uttarakhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mohan Singh in connection with FIR No. 36/2025 (involving alleged forged documents and fabricated power of attorney in a land transaction). The court found that Singh, though not originally named in the FIR, qualified for bail protection based on his status as an allegedly bona fide purchaser, the documentary nature of the case, completion of investigation, and the absence of need for custodial interrogation. Conditions: Bail is conditional upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties, cooperating with investigation, maintaining regular court appearance, not tampering with evidence, not leaving India without permission, and maintaining good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts