MOHAN SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — ABA/200/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),338,319(2),61(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010098182026
Filing Number
ABA/4696/2026
Filing Date
04-06-2026
Registration No
ABA/200/2026
Registration Date
04-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAN SINGH
Adv. S R S GILL,MILIND RAJ,MILIND RAJ, ,KUNDAN SINGH,MILIND RAJ
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 10-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: ABA/200/2026 - Mohan Singh v. State of Uttarakhand Decision: The Uttarakhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mohan Singh in connection with FIR No. 36/2025 (involving alleged forged documents and fabricated power of attorney in a land transaction). The court found that Singh, though not originally named in the FIR, qualified for bail protection based on his status as an allegedly bona fide purchaser, the documentary nature of the case, completion of investigation, and the absence of need for custodial interrogation. Conditions: Bail is conditional upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties, cooperating with investigation, maintaining regular court appearance, not tampering with evidence, not leaving India without permission, and maintaining good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ABA/200/2026 - Mohan Singh v. State of Uttarakhand Decision: The Uttarakhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mohan Singh in connection with FIR No. 36/2025 (involving alleged forged documents and fabricated power of attorney in a land transaction). The court found that Singh, though not originally named in the FIR, qualified for bail protection based on his status as an allegedly bona fide purchaser, the documentary nature of the case, completion of investigation, and the absence of need for custodial interrogation. Conditions: Bail is conditional upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties, cooperating with investigation, maintaining regular court appearance, not tampering with evidence, not leaving India without permission, and maintaining good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts