DARSHANA PANT S S YADAV vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSB/328/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010097992026
Filing Number
WPSB/5112/2026
Filing Date
04-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPSB/328/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
TRANSFER ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DARSHANA PANT S S YADAV
-
2.KRISHNAKANT MISHRA
-
3.ANURAG SRIVASTAVA
-
4.VISHWANATH PANDEY
-
5.BRIJESH KUMAR JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: WPSB/328/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand granted partial relief to three contract teachers challenging a Directorate circular that prevented them from applying for transfers from remote areas. The court found the distinction made between ad hoc appointees and contractual/guest faculty employees for counting remote service periods lacked rational basis. The court stayed the restrictive circular provision, allowing petitioners to submit transfer option forms, and directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks before listing the case for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
-
05-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSB/328/2026
Case Summary: WPSB/328/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand granted partial relief to three contract teachers challenging a Directorate circular that prevented them from applying for transfers from remote areas. The court found the distinction made between ad hoc appointees and contractual/guest faculty employees for counting remote service periods lacked rational basis. The court stayed the restrictive circular provision, allowing petitioners to submit transfer option forms, and directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks before listing the case for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts