SAMREEN FAIZAN ALI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1048/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010097912026
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
WPCRL/4682/2026
Filing Date
04-06-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/1048/2026
Registration Date
04-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL WRIT FOR PROTECTION ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAMREEN FAIZAN ALI
SHAHIL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. G.A.
MURSALEEN
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 18-06-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPCRL/1048/2026 The petition sought police protection for two petitioners (aged 18 and 20) who wish to marry but face threats from family members. The court directed petitioners to submit authentic documents (birth certificate, school certificates, etc.) to verify the age of petitioner no.1 by 18.06.2026, as Aadhaar Card alone is insufficient proof. Meanwhile, police are ordered to assess any genuine threat to the petitioners' safety and provide protection if warranted, while preventing family members from unlawfully interfering, threatening, or harassing them. Case adjourned to 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPCRL/1048/2026 The petition sought police protection for two petitioners (aged 18 and 20) who wish to marry but face threats from family members. The court directed petitioners to submit authentic documents (birth certificate, school certificates, etc.) to verify the age of petitioner no.1 by 18.06.2026, as Aadhaar Card alone is insufficient proof. Meanwhile, police are ordered to assess any genuine threat to the petitioners' safety and provide protection if warranted, while preventing family members from unlawfully interfering, threatening, or harassing them. Case adjourned to 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts