SAMREEN FAIZAN ALI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1048/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010097912026

Filing Number

WPCRL/4682/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1048/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL WRIT FOR PROTECTION ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMREEN FAIZAN ALI

  2. 2.SHAHIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.MURSALEEN

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: WPCRL/1048/2026 The petition sought police protection for two petitioners (aged 18 and 20) who wish to marry but face threats from family members. The court directed petitioners to submit authentic documents (birth certificate, school certificates, etc.) to verify the age of petitioner no.1 by 18.06.2026, as Aadhaar Card alone is insufficient proof. Meanwhile, police are ordered to assess any genuine threat to the petitioners' safety and provide protection if warranted, while preventing family members from unlawfully interfering, threatening, or harassing them. Case adjourned to 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1048/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL/1048/2026 The petition sought police protection for two petitioners (aged 18 and 20) who wish to marry but face threats from family members. The court directed petitioners to submit authentic documents (birth certificate, school certificates, etc.) to verify the age of petitioner no.1 by 18.06.2026, as Aadhaar Card alone is insufficient proof. Meanwhile, police are ordered to assess any genuine threat to the petitioners' safety and provide protection if warranted, while preventing family members from unlawfully interfering, threatening, or harassing them. Case adjourned to 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case