TANU vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1047/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010097892026

Filing Number

WPCRL/4681/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1047/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL WRIT FOR PROTECTION ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TANU

    Adv. RAKSHIT JOSHI,SWALEHA HUSSAIN,SWALEHA HUSSAIN, ,SWALEHA HUSSAIN

  2. 2.TARUN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.S.H.O.

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.SUKHPAL

  4. 4.SMT. NEETA

  5. 5.AKASH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: WPCRL 1047/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand granted protection to two major petitioners (Tanu, born 10.04.2004, and Tarun Kumar, born 01.01.2006) who sought safeguards to marry each other freely, as they faced threats and intimidation from the petitioner no.1's family members. The court directed the local police station to assess any threat to their life and liberty, provide necessary protection if threats exist, and summon opposing family members to counsel them against harassment or interference with the petitioners' relationship and proposed marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1047/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL 1047/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand granted protection to two major petitioners (Tanu, born 10.04.2004, and Tarun Kumar, born 01.01.2006) who sought safeguards to marry each other freely, as they faced threats and intimidation from the petitioner no.1's family members. The court directed the local police station to assess any threat to their life and liberty, provide necessary protection if threats exist, and summon opposing family members to counsel them against harassment or interference with the petitioners' relationship and proposed marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case